I’m somewhat ambivalent about the New Atheists. On the one hand I fully support their rationalist critique of religion. On the other I think they largely miss the point: that the brain ‘constructs’ reality through developing explanatory narratives and that it really, really likes a good story. In fact we could almost say the brain is addicted to narrative and often prefers fiction to cold, hard facts: artifice vs science, artifice wins.
It seems to me that the balance lies in holding both worldviews simultaneously; in knowing truth from fiction, whilst being able to immerse oneself in the pleasure of narrative – from whence all art derives.
At first I found myself agreeing with Sam. I do think a science based ethics is possible and it should be based on a nuanced consequentialist justification.
I would change the objective of such an ethics from ‘well being’ to ‘achieving one’s highest potential’. It seems to me that the latter necessarily achieves ‘well being’ whilst ‘well being’ might easily be construed in a rather mediocre sense – it would be possible to settle for a vague sense of ‘well being’ that is rather less than one’s highest potential.
I also agree with him that neuroscience is revolutionising our understanding of the mind. My novel Wild Child is ultimately about how a brain can be wired quite differently (Bliss has synesthesia and some of Dobrowski’s Overexcitabilities).
I also agree that a new ethics must be based on the findings of neuroscience. However, as I continued I became more and more restless. I thought he began to meander. At first I thought it was just my ill disciplined attention span, but then I realised he was jumping around a bit: citing the findings of various psychologists and then jumping to settling an old score. I think this is a problem of attempting to write two books at once. Perhaps it would have been a better book if he had simply focused on the science.
Okay, now to the substantive criticisms.
- The Naked Child in Art: The New Arguments Against 94,018 view(s)
- The Lure of Aphrodite’s Mirror: Brooke Shields and Eva Ionesco 73,516 view(s)
- The Naked Child in Art: Naturist Photography 64,602 view(s)
- The Naked Child in Art: Misty Dawn 36,941 view(s)
- Abigail Bray: Adopting the Paedophiliac Gaze 31,754 view(s)
- Eva Ionesco: My Little Princess 27,372 view(s)
- Photos 25,469 view(s)
- The Naked Child in Art: Photography 24,349 view(s)
- The Childhood Culture Wars: Dani Brubaker 21,058 view(s)
- Futanari 17,714 view(s)
- Carolyn on Moral Panic and the Vilification of Graham Ovenden
- powerman5000ca on Female Shredder: Shotaro Nakamura
- B on Woutherus Mol
- DD on Mexx Children’s Clothing Ad – Equal to the Boys.
- Ray on Concluding the Naked Child in Art Series
- Luna on Concluding the Naked Child in Art Series
- Silly on Addendum to the 5 Myths
- David Brodbeck on Mexx Children’s Clothing Ad – Equal to the Boys.
- sean on Abigail Bray: Adopting the Paedophiliac Gaze
- Kenneth Wade Wilson on Abigail Bray: Adopting the Paedophiliac Gaze
Abigail Bray About Ray Artemis Bill Henson Child Abuse Child Prodigy Christianity Classical Culture Dark Matter David Finklehor Emma Rush Empty Taboos Eros False Certainties Gail Dines Gifted Kids Guitar Prodigies Hippie Kids Intersexed Islam Japanese Culture Jock Sturges Melinda Tankard Reist Michael Carr-Gregg Moral Conservatives My Photographs Naked Child In Art Navaratri Porn Psyche Radical Ideas Rock Chicks Sexology Sexualisation Sexualisation Debate Sexuality Stonefield Suzanne Ost Talented Kids Tantra The Anthropology of Sex The Childhood Culture Wars Transgender Transgression Wild Child