It’s a clichè: if you want to see pictures of naked women (or children) just look in the pages of National Geographic. I have argued that the taboo over nudity is irrational and arbitrary. It is allowed in some circumstances, but not in others. These rules can be confusing.
There is a dark side to many of these rules – racism. The most taboo image is that of a naked, middle-class white girl. The greatest fury is always directed at any artist or photographer who breaks this specific taboo. Think about it. All the public controversies have been about photos of white girls – without exception.
Meanwhile images of naked tribal children are abundant and freely available. This is because they are the other: primitive, savage, uncivilized. Needless to say this is hypocritical, outrageously so. But again, we are talking about something deeply irrational, and in my view, sinister.
I have published many such photos and images in my discussion of anthropological variation, but very few of Aboriginal Australians. The nudity of the first Australians has always been a source of embarrassment to white Australia. And given that the last pre-contact band was encountered in the early 1960′s, there is an abundance of photographic material. The images below are from the Victorian and National library archives – and just for contrast, an image from a German naturist magazine of the 30′s. What is the difference, other than one is of civilized, white girls?
And to conclude I thought I would add an image from a new Australian program which shows how we now lie about our Aboriginal past. This shot is from the ABC’s My Place program. The ABC admits that in reality the children would be naked but that they had to invent costumes because it was a children’s program. However they are wrong. They simply would not be allowed to depict the children as they were even if the program was for adults. They are not allowed to depict naked children period, even if it is historically accurate. Thus we arrive at legally imposed historical revisionism, all to appease Judeo-Christian sensitivities.
Tagged with: Naked Child In Art
- The Lure of Aphrodite’s Mirror: Brooke Shields and Eva Ionesco 188,349 views
- The Naked Child in Art: The New Arguments Against 173,891 views
- The Naked Child in Art: Naturist Photography 160,561 views
- Revisiting My Little Princess, a Film by Eva Ionesco 115,748 views
- The Naked Child in Art: Misty Dawn 101,933 views
- Abigail Bray: Adopting the Paedophiliac Gaze 101,328 views
- Photos 96,008 views
- The Naked Child in Art: Photography 85,380 views
- Corporate Paedophilia: The Australia Institute Discussion Paper 75,507 views
- Hippie Kids 53,641 views
- Ray on Eden
- Anno on Eden
- Ray on Eden
- Anno on Eden
- Ray on The Naked Child in Art: Naturist Photography
- Ray on Hypersexuality in Children
- karl bauer on Hypersexuality in Children
- RedMane on The Naked Child in Art: Naturist Photography
- Mike on Graham Ovenden (2): Persecuting the Models
- Ray on Graham Ovenden (2): Persecuting the Models
Abigail Bray About Ray Artemis Bill Henson Child Abuse Child Prodigy Christianity Classical Culture Dark Matter David Finklehor Eden Emma Rush Empty Taboos Eros False Certainties Gail Dines Gifted Kids Hetty Johnston Hippie Kids Intersexed Islam Japanese Culture Jock Sturges Melinda Tankard Reist Michael Carr-Gregg Moral Conservatives Naked Child In Art Navaratri Porn Psyche Radical Ideas Rock Chicks Sexology Sexualisation Sexualisation Debate Sexuality Stonefield Suzanne Ost Talented Kids Tantra The Anthropology of Sex The Childhood Culture Wars Transgender Transgression Wild Child