Aryan Patriarchy and Dravidian Matriarchy

The more profound suppression involves the systematic distortion and rewriting of Indian history. Thadani has given numerous accounts of where the feminine of the original Sanskrit has been translated as masculine. She also encountered temples where the goddess had been mutilated and either replaced by or turned into a masculine god. One of the more amusing attempts to rewrite goddess mythology concerns the goddess Kali. There are many examples of artwork showing the fierce Kali standing on the corpse of Shiva with her tongue hanging out of her mouth. In the Shaivite and Shakta traditions the exposed tongue simple represents her fierce, defiant aspect and the iconography is about her dominance of Shiva. But in the Aryan retelling the tongue is said to represent shame – Kali is showing remorse for accidently stepping on her ‘husband’ Shiva.

I said earlier that in the Aryan ideology a woman must see her husband as her guru. If he tells her something is so, it is so. On another list devoted to Indian issues I was surprised to read one Indian recount how the women in his family were shocked to find out that the Shivalingam statues they had been touching in temples were in fact phallic symbols. I was shocked because in my Shaivite ashram it was very clearly explained that the Shivalingam represented the male and female principles and was a representation of a penis in a vagina. But it seems that in conservative Aryan households such ‘delicate’ information is kept from women.

But it goes much further than that; it extends to the almost complete neglect and avoidance of the goddess in museums and universities. Thadani tells of important goddess statues hidden in vaults in poor conditions and of academics who refuse to accept the evidence. She tells of one encounter where a leading archaeologist is standing with her in front of what she says is clearly a goddess statue with him insisting it is male. ‘But it has breasts,’ she exclaims.

Thadani also goes on to explain that the religious departments of many universities focus on Aryan literature and that there is vast amount of Tantric and Shakta literature that remains to be translated and studied. If they are anything like the Yoni Tantra then it might not be hard to understand why a conservative Aryan male might be shocked. The Yoni Tantra is a classic of Shakta literature and it states quite clearly that the way to enlightenment is the worship of a woman’s vagina. All vaginas should be worshipped from age 12 to 60, of all castes and types. It says:

“In Kaula every woman is thought of as a manifestation of the Goddess. No man may raise his hand, strike or threaten a woman. When she is naked, men must kneel and worship her as the Goddess. She has equal rights with men on all levels.”

In other Shakta Tantras the aspirant is urged to worship semen and menstrual blood:


pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

3 Responses to Aryan Patriarchy and Dravidian Matriarchy

  1. admin says:

    Nice summary. I have to point out though that the idea of the singularity is not at all at odds with Abrahamic religions. The Kabbalistic Jews call that singularity the “ein sof” — the point-source of life and the emanations of awareness (roughly translated from the original Hebrew: boundless infinite). It is the heart of the Tree of Life mentioned in the Torah/Bible.

    Non-religiously, one must understand that something conscious organizes that light into a singularity — physics would demand it, otherwise there would be only heat and chaos. Please consider this carefully.

    I can tell you from my own experience, that that singularity is none other than YHVH Him and Herself — a perfect union of male and female principles that creates, sustains, and protects the Tree of Life.

    Cosmologically, that singularity has been through at least 6 cycles — each with that same sacred name — it is the name, from our perspective outside it, which holds the singularity together. Lao Tsu didn’t know that it had a name and just called it the Tao.

    In any case, these cycles are interesting back-story that wasn’t told in Genesis and happened before YHVH created our present story of Eden.

    In a way that Tree of Life awaits Mankind’s completion from embarking upon/with the Tree of Knowledge — that journey that is near completion here in the Information Age — which will reflect the original Tree and allow all of Mankind and the planet herself to be brought back to beauty and perfection.

    Mark Janssen

  2. admin says:

    I should clarify that I mean orthodox Abrahamic faith, or ‘mainstream’. I do not include Kabbalah, Gnosticism or Sufism. I accept what you say about ‘ein sof’ and recognize that Gnosticism and Sufism reached similar conclusions (without going into a long explanation).

    However, I do not accept that “physics would demand” that “something conscious organizes” it. I would ask you instead to carefully consider the physics of chaos and the principle of self-organization.

  3. admin says:

    Hello Mr.Ray Harris
    I am K.Sathiyaraj from Tamil Nadu, India. I am working as an Asst.Professor in dept of MBA. Article is really good, I request you to do more research on the mith of aryan invasion in India. Now a days linguist are proving the same hypothesis with the etymological studies.
    All the best.
    Regards,
    K.sathiyaraj.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>